Oil Groove Macro

Create oil-groove macro paths with local geometry calculations and local template rules.

All tools free forever

Tip: Generate a helical oil-groove template with pitch and pass count.

Results

905.28
Estimated toolpath length (mm)
-30
End Z (mm)
5.658
Estimated time (min)
O9101 (Helical oil groove template for Fanuc/Haas) (Replace motion block with control-specific synchronized helix cycle) #100=0.000 (Start Z) #101=-30.000 (End Z) #102=28.800 (Groove radius) #103=6.000 (Pitch per rev) #104=5.000 (Turns) #105=160 (Feed) G18 G90 G40 G80 IF[#102 LE 0] THEN #3000=1(RADIUS ERROR) IF[#104 LE 0] THEN #3000=2(TURN ERROR) G0 X#102 Z#100 (EXAMPLE: G33.1 Z#101 K#103 F#105) (or use C-axis interpolation based on controller manual) G0 Z#100 M99
Generated macro
Linked Parameter Diagram
oilGrooveMacro

Input / Output Bars

Inputs

Program number9,101
Work diameter60
Groove depth1.2
Helix pitch6

Outputs

Estimated toolpath length905.276
End Z-30
Estimated time5.658

Geometry View

Program / Diagnosis Flow

oilGrooveMacro
Estimated toolpath length
905.276
End Z
-30
Estimated time
5.658
Program number
9,101
Work diameter
60
Groove depth
1.2

Tool role and boundaries

Oil Groove Macro is not a one-shot number widget. It is an engineering baseline tool for real shop-floor decisions. Create oil-groove macro paths with local geometry calculations and local template rules. This tool generates parametric macro templates for CNC controllers, requiring dry-run validation before production use.

Treat every output as a first-pass candidate, not an immediate production command: run defaults first, tune one variable at a time, and record machine, tooling, fixture, and material-lot context.

Fast baseline workflow

  1. Run once with defaults to confirm units and expected behavior.
  2. Lock constraints first (dimensions, machine limits, setup boundaries), then tune controls.
  3. Change one key variable per iteration and record why it changed.
  4. Check primary outputs against machine capability before secondary metrics.
  5. Validate first piece with conservative override before moving to target cycle.
  6. Store accepted values with revision tags so shift handoff stays reproducible.

Input strategy

Use a three-layer input model:

  • Constraint layer: dimensions, tolerances, travels, clamping, controller limits.
  • Control layer: speed, feed, engagement, compensation, cycle parameters.
  • Target layer: takt time, cost, scrap risk, tool-change frequency.

A common failure mode is pushing control values before constraints are stable. Lock constraints first, then build a stable operating window with small increments.

Output interpretation

Interpret results in order: primary safety checks first, then stability, then economics.

  1. Safety: no machine, tool, or fixture limit violations.
  2. Stability: load, thermal, and vibration behavior remains controlled.
  3. Economics: cycle and cost align with shift target.

Current focus outputs include Figure-8/spiral groove, Coordinate generation, Local macro preview. If numbers conflict with floor behavior, verify units and inputs before changing strategy.

NC program notes

This page outputs Fanuc and Haas style templates. Before release, enforce these checks:

  • Confirm controller support for macro variables, cycles, and trig syntax.
  • Verify modal preamble (for example G17, G90, G40, G49, G80).
  • Review clearance plane, retract height, and feed variables against setup reality.
  • First run should be dry-run, single-block, and reduced override.

Typical failure modes and fixes

  • Sudden output jump: verify units, decimal precision, and input ordering first.
  • Unexpected trend: inspect workholding, tool condition, and thermal stability before retuning.
  • Big machine-to-machine delta: compare servo behavior, coolant coverage, spindle health, and compensation tables.
  • Shift handoff instability: enforce revision logging for program, tool, and parameter timestamp.

Keep rollback points and use single-variable increments to avoid coupled uncertainty.

FAQ

Can outputs be used directly for production?

Not immediately. Validate first piece, then short-run stability, then release to full production.

Why does floor behavior differ from computed values?

This is expected. Material lot, tool wear, thermal state, and machine dynamics all shift outcomes.

When should I recalculate?

Recalculate whenever tooling, fixturing, material lot, controller parameters, or takt target changes.

Final recommendation

Use Oil Groove Macro inside a fixed loop: baseline, first-piece validation, single-variable tuning, parameter freeze, and revision tracking. The outcome is not just one result but a repeatable process capability.